- Most Viewed
- Publications
- By Topic
- Data Book
- Facts from EBRI
- Fast Facts
- Fundamentals
- Issue Briefs
- Notes
- Policy Books
- President’s Reports
- Press Releases
- Special Reports
- Testimony
- Resources
- Benefit Bibliography
- Benefit FAQs
- Links to Other Internet Resources
- Reference Shelf
- Special Issues of Periodicals
- What’s New in Employee Benefits
May 2000 Policy Forum
The Economic Costs of the Uninsured:
Implications for Business and Government
An EBRI-ERF Policy Forum
May 3, 2000
Arnold and Porter Conference Center
Washington, DC
9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Employers in both
the private sector and the public sector are the dominant source of health insurance for
nonelderly individuals in the United States, providing coverage for nearly two-thirds of
this population in 1998. Employers offer
health benefits to promote health, to increase worker productivity, and as a form of
compensation to recruit and retain qualified workers.
Workers and their families benefit by being provided protection from
financial losses that can accompany unexpected serious illness or injury. They also benefit by having access to the health
care delivery system.
Roughly 85
percent of the 44 million uninsured Americans are in a family with a working adult. As a result, the employment-based health insurance
system has been criticized as failing to provide health insurance coverage to all
Americans. Critics often suggest that
the employment-based health insurance system should be replaced with an individual-based
system. The fact that there are really two
employment-based systems - one for small employers and one for large employers - is often
not recognized. Integration of these systems
may go a long way towards improving the health care delivery system, and may have far
reaching effects on the U.S. economy.
It has been
argued that all Americans pay for the cost of caring for the uninsured through cost
shifting. All Americans may pay for it
through taxes. Insured Americans may pay for
it through higher premiums, and businesses may pay for it through diminished
organizational effectiveness. While cost
shifting may have declined in the last few years, it may mean that less money is available
to care for the uninsured. Ultimately, all
Americans may pay for the uninsured, as the opportunity cost of an uninsured population is
lost economic value in the U.S. economy.
Should
employers be concerned about the uninsured population?
Do employers add value by being involved in the purchase of health care for
workers and their families? What are the
private sector and the public sector doing to increase access to health insurance
coverage? Are there adverse consequences of
driving employers out of the health care delivery system?
Are the short-run and long-run costs to society in terms of resource consumption
and economic opportunity higher or lower than the cost of universal coverage? How can the employment-based health insurance
system be sustained, and should it be?
These are
some of the questions that will be addressed at the EBRI-ERF Policy Forum on the economic
costs of the uninsured. Virtually no research
has been done connecting health insurance status to the performance of the economy. However, a small number of studies have started to
put together a link between population health, productivity, and economic output. This research has implications for consumers,
business, government, and the economy, and also suggests that the cost of universal
coverage should not be measured simply in terms of the cost of covering the uninsured, but
also in terms of the opportunity cost of diminished economic opportunities.
I. Welcome and Introduction
This panel will provide the framework
for the forum. An overview of the
employment-based health insurance system, trends in health benefits, and uninsured workers
will be presented. A presentation on the
future of employment-based coverage and the uninsured will be made, followed by a
presentation on the evolving employer role in the current health care financing and
delivery system and the consequences of breaking the connection between employers and the
health care delivery system.