- Most Viewed
- By Topic
- EBRI Bibliography By Topic
- Data Book
- Facts from EBRI
- Fast Facts
- Issue Briefs
- Policy Books
- President’s Reports
- Press Releases
- Special Reports
- Benefit Bibliography
- Benefit FAQs
- Links to Other Internet Resources
- Reference Shelf
- Special Issues of Periodicals
- What’s New in Employee Benefits
How Readable Are Summary Plan Descriptions For Health Care Plans?
October 2006, Vol. 27, No. 10
Paperback, 12 pp.
PDF, 132 kb
Employee Benefit Research Institute, 2006
• SPDs are the primary source of health plan information: The summary plan description (SPD) is the primary source of information for workers who participate in an employment-based health care plan. This study investigates whether private-sector employers’ SPDs are written so that an average plan participant can identify and read important information contained in the document, as required by federal law. The study collected and tested SPDs for 40 health care plans from a diverse national sample and subjected them to content and readability analyses.
• Important information contained in many SPDs is written at a reading level that may be too high for the average plan participant: The study found that the average readability level for important information concerning eligibility, benefits, and participant rights and responsibilities in summary plan descriptions is written at a first year college reading level. The average level of readability for SPDs is higher than the recommended reading level for technical material. Some of the SPDs in the study sample use language written at a 9th grade reading level. Other SPDs use language written at nearly a college graduate (16th grade) reading level.
• Readability levels do not differ between single-employer health care plans and multi-employer health care plans: The study found no statistically significant differences in readability levels between SPDs for health care plans sponsored by single- and multi-employer health care plans for union workers. The language used for both types of plans tested out at a college reading level.
• Fundamental literacy a barrier to health care literacy: According to the U.S. Department of Education, about 43 percent of American adults scored at below basic or basic levels of prose literacy (able to read and understand sentences and paragraphs), and 34 percent scored at below basic or basic levels of document literacy (able to read sentence fragments, such as a medical prescription). Given the rapidly rising share of the immigrant, non-English-speaking U.S. population, a major barrier to health care literacy is the underlying issue of fundamental literacy.
• Implications: Findings from this study suggest that fundamental improvements are needed in the readability of written SPDs, and that employers and plan administrators should explore the use of alternative methods of communication to plan participants beyond the written SPD. Also, the trend toward consumer-driven health care plans may make the challenge of communicating information to participants through written SPDs even more difficult, since these plans shift significant responsibility to the participants in the plan for decisions concerning the utilization of health care services. This shift in decision-making responsibility to participants makes it more important than ever that participants understand how their health plan works.
EBRI Research and Education Centers
- 401(k) Valuations Published: November 30, 2013 401(k) Balances and Changes Due to Market Volatility
- Data Book Last Updated: February 2013 A comprehensive collection of the most up-to-date benefit information available